ABC News
Al Jezeera
Alternet
American Conservative
Associated Press (AP)
The Atlantic
Axios
BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation)
Bipartisan Report
The Blaze
Bloomberg
Breitbart
BuzzFeed
CBS News
Christian Science Monitor
CNN
Conservative Tribune
Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
Daily Mail
Daily Wire
Drudge Report
The Economist
Fiscal Times
Foreign Policy
Forward Progressives
Fox News
The Guardian
The Hill
Huffington Post
InfoWars
Intercept
Local News (various)
Mother Jones
MSNBC
The Nation
National Review
Natural News
New York Post
New York Times
New Yorker
Newsmax
NPR (National Public Radio)
Occupy Democrats
One America Network (OAN)
Palmer Report
PBS (Public Broadcasting Service)
Politico
Reason
Red State
Reuters
San Francisco Chronicle
Slate
USA Today
Vanity Fair
Vox
Wall Street Journal
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times
The Week
Weekly Standard
Image: Central European University
Yeah, everything depends on your perspective. But isn't the right answer the one the writer of the number intended? A little research would uncover the truth!
The Media Bias Chart by Vanessa Otero is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Review the BLARE article analysis method above. Carefully read through the article assigned to your group, and mark each sentence or paragraph with B, L, A, R, and E as applicable. Feel free to write other notes as well!
Please research the following piece of writing in two ways: 1) Try and find the news outlet's journalism policy, code of ethics, or the standards that govern the work of their journalists. This list by the American Society of News Editors may be useful in your search, but if your news outlet is not listed, continue searching online. 2) Find out if the writer of the article is a journalist. If they aren't, what kind of background do they have?
EXAMPLE Andrew Liptak --The Verge
Group 1 Mark Sumner -- Daily KOS
Group 2 BBC News
Group 3 Ellen Nakashima -- The Washington Post
Group 4 Hans A. von Spakovsky -- National Review
Group 5 Derek Hunter -- Town Hall
Group 6 Arthur Delaney -- The Huffington Post
Group 7 Sylvan Lane -- The Hill
Group 8 Edward-Isaac Dovere -- Politico
Group 9 Stef W. Kight -- Axios
Group 10 Pema Levy -- Mother Jones
Group 11 Mark Moore -- New York Post
Group 12 Deb Riechmann -- Associated Press
Advice from professional fact-checkers:
Leave the site to research it. Don’t trust the “about us” page. Don't trust anything the site says about its own purpose or reputation. Research the name of the sponsoring organization to see if there is information that clarifies its purpose and its reputation as a news source.
Ignore the order of search results in Google. Some sites pay Google to be listed high in the search results, and some sites pay Google to place ads in the search results (see box on this page called Google Search Results). Look deep into the search results, not just at the first 10 offerings.
Are the sources cited? Is there documentation? Have claims been backed up by relevant documentation, such as studies, records, statistics and other fact-based evidence?
Watch for "click-bait." If the headline or link makes an outrageous claim, it is probably trying to get you to click on it for profit.
Watch for inflammatory language, as well as more subtle forms of persuasion. If the site makes you angry or emotional in some way, be aware that you may be the victim of manipulation. Read other sources, do some fact-checking. If it is something you really agree strongly with, beware of confirmation bias. Read some sources from the other perspectives.
If the site allows readers to comment, read them. Frequently you find that people are disputing what an author says and giving additional or contradictory evidence.
Read multiple sources of information to get a variety of viewpoints and media frames. Watch out if known/reputable news sites are not reporting on a story you heard about in a less-reputable source. Sometimes lack of coverage is the result of corporate media bias and other factors, but there should typically be more than one source reporting on a topic or event.
Image: Albuquerque Public Library Image: Indiana University East.
1. Read these three blog posts by Vanessa Otero:
and
August 2017: "The Chart, Version 2.0: What Makes a News Source 'Good'?"
and
November 2017: The Chart, Version 3.0: What, Exactly, Are We Reading?
2. Now, research Vanessa Otero's chart; find out what people think of it. Read some positive and negative criticism of it. Has anyone published their own version of the chart? Write a one paragraph summary of what you find and how you feel about your own placement of news outlets on the grid.
"Article quality can vary greatly even within the same news source. One should be able to rank an individual article on the chart in the same way one ranks a whole news source. So, what makes an article/story high or low quality? It’s hard to completely eliminate one’s own bias on that issue, but one way to try to do it consistently is to categorize and rate the actual sentences and words that make it up its headline and the article itself. In order to try to rank any article on the chart in a consistent, objective-as-possible manner, I started doing sentence-by-sentence analyses of different types of articles."
"Americans Think ABC and CBS are Most Credible News Sources; The Onion and Fox News Least. "
"How Does Your Favorite News Source Rate on the Truthiness Scale?"
"Here are the Most and Least Trusted News Outlets in America"
Initial placement (group 1 -- left side of the room)
Placement after research (group 1 -- left side of the room)
Initial placement (Group 2 -- right side of room)
Placement after research (Group 2 -- right side of room)